A useful cycle route is often the missing link between places people already need to reach. In Enfield, one such link is now off the table: the council confirmed on 7 October 2026 that its proposed walking and cycling connection between New Southgate and Palmers Green stations will not go ahead.
The decision follows a review of priorities by the new council administration. It cancels a proposed improvement, rather than closing an existing cycleway. People can still make journeys in the area, but should not plan on this project delivering a new connected route.
What the route was meant to connect
The council’s project description linked the two railway stations with Cycleway 20 and Arnos Grove Underground station. It also envisaged connections through Arnos Park towards Barnet and to existing cycling provision along the A406 via Wilmer Way.
Concept proposals included protected cycle lanes on Bowes Road and Wilmer Way, quieter-street riding and crossing improvements. Together, those elements were intended to join destinations into a network, rather than provide an isolated stretch of cycle lane.
What remains under consideration
Enfield says it is exploring the next design stage for the pedestrian crossing on Broomfield Lane. It identifies this location as a safety priority, citing collision information, traffic surveys and community feedback.
Possible changes include a crossing upgrade, wider footways at the crossing and raised road sections to encourage slower traffic. This is design work under consideration—not an announced construction start. The update provides no delivery date or replacement cycling route.
What riders can do now
The project page still contains older proposal and consultation information. Read the dated 7 October update before treating those plans as forthcoming improvements. Questions can be sent to the council’s published project address, journeysandplaces@enfield.gov.uk.
When planning a ride, use current mapping and assess the existing roads and crossings. An old concept drawing is not a promise of a protected route on the ground.
Our view: crossings and connections both matter
A better crossing is worth having, particularly for people walking and wheeling. But one crossing cannot do the job of a connected cycling route. For an ordinary station journey, the awkward junction or unprotected section can decide whether someone rides at all. The useful next question is what will address the network gap left by this decision.
Council update, 7 October 2026 · Official route background · Plan a route using current information
Join the discussion
What has worked for you? Share your experience or ask a question about this article.
Sign in with GitHub to comment. Your comment and GitHub profile name will be public. Comments appear when posted and may be moderated afterwards.
Keep replies relevant and respectful. No spam, personal information or unsupported accusations. Discussion and privacy information.